Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Utiliser Ixus 870is En Webcam

governments and charitable Medicine in Colonia


At the time of the conquest and colonization of the New World, the medical knowledge and surgical the metropolis was unaware of the advances and discoveries that were made outside their borders. The knowledge taught in universities (Alcala, Sevilla and Osuna, among others) was dependent primarily on the reading of Hippocrates, Galen and Avicenna. With the theoretical study of these authors for four years (each year corresponded to a course) and after having practiced in the company of a doctor approved, students should be examined before a chief physician, before you book the letters of graduates.
Among the surgeons had two categories of Latinos, who was regarded as superior because it is required the absolute dominance of Latin, and the romances, training those who would excuse empirical knowledge of Latin. In the last level there were the barbers, midwives and healers both sexes, usually plied their trade in the villages.
Barbers, whose main activity was cut beard and hair, were also practicing other related medicine. The most common were the practice of bloodletting and tooth extraction.
Obviously, the capital of the New Kingdom of Granada prevailed, aggravated similar limitations in the practice of medicine, ie the tools that were available to against diseases, pests, disease and other enemies of human health, were so primitive and inefficient as many centuries before. The fundamental concepts of medicine were basically the same that prevailed in Spain at that time. Continued in full force the fundamental concepts of Hippocrates and Galen. According to the Hippocratic doctrine, the human body had four active agents or "humors": blood, phlegm, black bile and yellow bile. According to the Greek master's thesis, each of these moods had a complexion: the blood hot and moist, phlegm cold and wet, black bile, cold and dry, and yellow bile, hot and dry. Hippocrates also said that the three most important body organs heart, brain and liver were, respectively, dry and hot, wet and cold and hot and humid. A normal, healthy body would then have plenty of heat and humidity. However, Hippocrates accepted that this balance may vary with different people, so it could have complexions essentially hot, humid, cold or dry.
health would, therefore, the result of the harmony and proper balance between these qualities. Upon any imbalance would appear the pain and ill health. Hence, the main therapies to balance these elements were the purges, emetics, bloodletting and cupping.
Despite the limitations of colonial medicine, these little lights were alien in our midst. For various reasons, before the nineteenth century could not be established in rule a professor of medicine and much less structured academic plan. Of course, there were many attempts. Since the sixteenth century the Dominicans sought authorization to the Viceroy for academic studies could be established. During the seventeenth century was also feigned not materialized.
Enriquez Andrade The doctor tried to start an honorary chair of medicine but gave up for different reasons.
With the founding of the Colegio del Rosario, were included in the plan some medical courses chained to the jurisprudence and philosophy. In 1651 the other courses had begun to operate, less than medicine, "suitable person for failing to carry it." Even in the eighteenth century are equally frustrated attempts.
In 1733, at a time when in Europe were beginning to be decisive steps on the path to modern medicine, the Italian physician Francisco Fontes, strange designs that came to rest in this very remote town, offered his services to fill the that it was vacant chair in the Rosary. The offer was accepted, but the Italian had to retire it soon after failing to enroll or a student because santafereño society believed that the practice of medicine was peculiar to people of low social status.
Later, in 1760, the chair was occupied by a character named Roman Cancino who, although he had no medical degree, they had some knowledge. Cancino later died and was replaced by a doctor Juan de Vargas, who runs a medical chair elementary irregular and uneven.
now fully illustration, Archbishop Viceroy Antonio Caballero y Góngora tried to restructure the department of medicine giving it a more serious and scientific. The failure of the initiative was total. At that time, the brilliant visionary political, economic and social development of the New Kingdom which was Pedro Fermín de Vargas wrote about this topic:
"It's a pain having to Santafé chair of theology so that it is very necessary these countries have been careful not so useful a man like that of medicine. "
It is pertinent to note here that this concept was the direct heir of Spain after the Reconquest, in which practical skills were exercised by Moorish and Jewish converts or their descendants. Consequently, the practice of any such activity was suspected in those who exercised to bring upon them the stigma of New Christians depressing. By contrast, the old Christian spotless Saracen or Jewish blood was a warrior, priest, lawyer, or lord of the land . In Latin America this contempt for practical activities such as medicine, lost the ethical connotations of religious to acquire other purely social.

In 1801, when the New Kingdom was receiving a number of years the beneficial influence of the wise Mutis, became a priest named island to assemble and organize in a chair Rosario serious medicine. Isla's father designed a curriculum for eight years, devoting five to three for theoretical and practical. Introduced classes in anatomy, physiology and pathology in an attempt to emancipate the studies of traditional Hippocratic protection. Isla's father took his students the practical period at the hospital of San Juan de Dios and reached grade seven, which can be said that the firm began professional career in the field of medicine in Bogotá . 3301940916609711

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Hodgkins Lymphoma Survival Rate

The injunction against the FARC



OPINET COLUMN

would be difficult to get to question whether the mass marches against the FARC mark a complete break between the position of 'indifference' that had long been the Colombian population and the time awaited in which people manifest a total exhaustion and weariness against the conflict and its protagonists, especially with names such as has occurred. That will be to the extent that the momentum achieved in these times of 'effervescence and warmth' is renewed whenever necessary and not become the manifestation of rejection in a flower day. Under this perspective, we can say without doubt that the march of 4F - and subsequent, or other demonstrations against - will have its effect.
What is very clear is the meaning resulting from the protest and to explain it must be clear in the sense that at least five million people marched against the FARC on behalf of the entire country. The number of demonstrators, its social, racial, cultural, etc., And the various scenarios in which the protest took place, they realize a national phenomenon of unprecedented proportions. He left in the main cities but also in small and remote municipalities where even had direct organizers of the protest. Marched from the worshipful neighborhoods to the poorest people. Left people of all races and all professions, from people who have not learned to have greater access to education. Left people of all religious aspects and all political. The number of protesters
deserves special comment. Did not go the 22 million people who called the FARC (in a statement apocryphal) to feel alluded to and change their attitude. However, somewhere between five and ten million is a massive turnout because it is virtually impossible that all people come to the same site at the same time. There are about ten million children under twelve years, which should not be carrying these concentrations, nor be left alone - without the company of adults-at home.

There are hundreds of thousands of sick and elderly who could not attend. There are many people who live in places far removed from urban centers and there are millions who had to work and for whom there was no permission whatsoever to participate in the mobilization. To this are added the problems of transport to move as many people in so little time and the finite number of individuals that fit into a particular site, such as Plaza de Bolivar. But
issue is not only massive and diverse participation from all points of view, but the resounding and unmistakable message of outrage against the FARC, expressed through messages printed on T-shirts and banners or slogans chanted by the crowd.

This time, the Colombians did not turn out to suck paddle and enjoy music of 'Papayera' as in other marches where complaints were diluted in general calls to violence. Before, he was afraid of people speaking out against the guerrillas or numbered - at ease - to those who advocate a political agreement by the fallacy that the FARC were invincible and to end the lawsuit should be eligible for your needs.
And this is the main change from the start: the Colombian people have given a mandate for their dignity which is no longer willing to accept the blackmail of peace in exchange for what the terrorists want.

demobilize If the FARC are welcome, no more privileges within society if they remain in the bush, the Government has received support not just a task it has been doing to combat subversion but a true custom than by citizen mandate.
Finally, it is important to note the sad mistake in dropping some 'friends' of subversion, saying that hate and rejection will only lead to more war and close the door for a negotiated solution. Nothing has fueled more violence in Colombia that the social indifference and the absence of State, therefore, otherwise it can not produce more of the same. And it was the FARC that ended with his humiliation, any possibility that the Colombian people bend their necks again, as the Marxists seek accompanying outdated.

sabotage the march in Paris

The February 4 march in Paris as a meeting place was the Hotel de Ville, like saying the Alpujarra and the Plaza in Medellin Bolivar in Bogotá. On Friday, the family of Ingrid Betancur asked the mayor of Paris to cancel the march because it was "organized by the paramilitaries and the Colombian government." Given the Betancur family pressures, the mayor of Paris decided to change the meeting place and send to the Square of Chatelet. That is, we move from the Square Alpujarra Uribe Uribe or the Park Plaza de Bolivar in Bogota Journalist. All this is explained in the analogy so that you can get an idea of \u200b\u200bchange to which we were subjected missing only two days to go.
But one of the main reasons to change the site underway Chatelet is that there is a photo of Ingrid Betancourt and the one at the Hotel de Ville, where his family came to Give violated.
In the Place de Chatelet not have the same amenities: access is rather complicated because the four streets bordering the heavily traveled, so it could only go in circles, but in turn, it was not possible to do all at once .
Over time, many Colombians came to seek his countrymen lost in the previously established meeting point: the Hotel de Ville. But the police officers guarding the mayor of Paris (meeting place), had orders not to let anyone dressed in white or some piece of that color. Therefore
was almost impossible to prevent people who were arriving at the Hotel de Ville looking for other dealers. To this situation I decided to go to the Hotel de Ville to send the lost to the Place de Chatelet. On the way to see how the organizer and another girl were arrested by police said they could not go to the Hotel de Ville. I could go, fortunately, because he had a dark coat covering my shirt dunes.Within the Hotel de Ville I met many Colombians who were 'lost', and believed that the march was canceled. Many could speak but police would not allow people to come together there. I spent about an hour redirecting people to the Place de Chatelet. Then I went back to the place where I was happy to see Mr. Ambassador and a good retinue Colombian and French in the cold and rain conspired to say: NO TO THE FARC! LES NON FARC!
Everything seemed to be going very well until they got some French saying that we should not be there. In a moment I was so offended that I asked one of them if he knew what was suffered by a hostage, if you knew the pain of friends or relatives who were kidnapped a loved one. I asked him who he was and to my surprise, his response was: "I am the committee to support the family of Ingrid Betancourt." Everything seemed too obvious, because in France the polarization of the abduction issue passes through the hands of the Betancourt family.

In Paris the climate of the "run" (and write it in quotes because it was only a concentration) was full of contradictions between Colombian and French THANKS TO FAMILY BETANCUR.

today before you all want to denounce the manipulation that has the family of Ingrid Betancourt on the media in France, notably in Paris ...


Maria Paula

Lawyer

Doctorate in Political Science

Paris - France

Friday, February 1, 2008

_nec Dvd_rw Nd-3550a Read

See

OPINET COLUMN
Many must remember the marches that occurred in Spain in 1997, to protest the murder committed by ETA-de Miguel Angel Blanco Garrido, a councilman from a small town in Vizcaya. In Colombia, hundreds of councilors have been killed in the last 20 years without even a headline on the front page, much less, without becoming grievances or change at least the nation's future. A Luis Carlos Galan, a collusion between mafia and politics, was assassinated on a Friday and next Sunday the whole country was devoted to the soccer game selection Colombia in Barranquilla, in search of Italy's World Cup qualifying. We have lived
anesthetized. At present generations of Colombians have touched us just a time of violence and misrule intertwined with short periods of apparent tranquility. Arguably usual, but we did callus in the soul before some facts and realities that elsewhere would be disruptive, so we said, "and we incriminated" to be indifferent. However, it could also be said that this attitude has been a defense mechanism that has enabled us to pursue a normal life while Pablo Escobar unleashed the strongest wave of terrorism in cities like Medellin and Bogota, people continued their routine activities almost without variation, working, studying, having fun.
We often use another defense mechanism even more cruel: if you kidnap someone blames for having a lot of money if you kill another, 'who knows what mess was walking' or 'no one sent him to mess with these people' ... and well. That is, to survive despite the fear, to distrust and uneasiness is not paralyze us, to intimidate us not so much misfortune, we attribute blame the victims and believe that the thing is not with us or with our families, because "you do not he's involved in strange things 'or is attractive prey for criminals because, we say' you have nothing."
Perhaps if we had long understood that reflection is attributed to Bertolt Brecht, the true author is Martin Niemoeller, which says "First they came for the Communists ..." maybe we would have saved much misery and could have formed a more egalitarian and just society at this time would take us light years ahead in development and, above all, peace, that calm that exists in many countries although there is some degree of poverty and exclusion. So far you've come this collective trance-box, this lethargy, this numbness of our people that surveys are repeated as the happiest people in the world, as people more happy and satisfied, perhaps because it produces the known live among so much violence and survive the day without a scratch, despite the bombs in the city, of kidnapping in the road, the slaughter in the village, the shooting in the neighborhood.
However, these mechanisms can not be permanent in the mind of the individual. One day we had to get tired and we are increasingly those who do not support the option indifference to those who do not attend to the nature of the social pact, which is not an alternative or an option to take or leave at will, much less a tie framing a tyranny when there is a growing democracy deeper. So there is no room for indifference to the violence but also to the state that dares to default on their primary duties, both to protect citizens and to improve the living conditions of all.
The march of February 4, against the FARC, against kidnapping, "to be caused by citizens' initiative, is the seed of awakening of Colombians, the end of the indifference and the beginning of a period of increased participation public demonstrations and not biased to be substantive lead to a state of peace and prosperity that Colombians have not met but we deserve and that will come when we understand that our welfare is the responsibility of each and every one of us.
And with these marches, each is responsible, with their assistance, their own rejection of violence. Because not enough with a repudiation understatement but it's time to speak up before they come to us, for each one, and it is too late. 3301940916609711