OPINET COLUMN
The formation of new generations of Colombians are not on the best way
think the younger generation should be the highest desire of the country, but unfortunately we see daily that the threats facing these are critical for training, so that outcrops a serious doubt about what will emerge from there: the Colombian women and men in the second quarter of the century. Here are three cases:
The first. The Supreme Court (the Court again!) Transmute just a case of sexual abuse in less than nine years in a simple injury. A shopkeeper grabbed a girl by force, took her to the back, felt his buttocks, kissed abused (by sticking the tongue) and tried to rape her without being able to consummate the act because she could escape. No doubt there have to be very cynical to deny the severity of the episode and the unquestionable sexual connotation of abuse - how do I know? - could have had for the murder of climax menor.Además very irresponsible the Court to give carte blanche to a depraved repeat this for the future. Now, as no foreign body chastens in, I wonder if the Supreme Court have taken the same determination in the event that the girl was the daughter of a judge ... I doubt it. More serious still are the arguments exposed by the high court, beating competition from the judges because it is not their area of \u200b\u200bexpertise, in the sense that the sexual education of the child is not affected by the incident. That is, am going to argue that if a baby does not remember the abuse, no crime. That case sabotage is the purpose of civil society to give these monsters to life imprisonment.
second case. Only in the eighties, the training of young people in the home and school was more strict, without necessarily physical or psychological, that of "the rod and spoil" a thing of the past. Yes, there were teachers bitter, a little tyrants and humiliating, but generally applied a wholesome discipline, no serious abuses. What we see now? The boys do what they want: do not study or do homework because the wording of Decree 230 of 2002, we must give them the year, abuse and disrespect to teachers and peers, not attend classes and if they do, they spent talking on a cell phone, play play or listen to iPod, etc.No is no coincidence that the breakdown has been given to the Constitution of 91, which showed the 'right' of children to do what they please for the sake of the free development of his personality, that is, letting young people are trained in state of nature or deform themselves. And the result is the increase in juvenile crime and the rise of a generation that is considered unimpeachable anarchic, which rejects the authority figures and have no respect for the rules. Securities, nor talk. Third
case. These young people, and useless for the sake of the free development of his personality, and very malleable, come to a public university run by a drug addict - will merit! - to hear speeches of characters with hoods and turbans should be in jail, not only to condoning crime but by the clear evidence of sharing the ideas of terrorist groups, defend their actions and work for them. Then white is eaten fried.
Several studies (such as the Rand Corporation: Urban Battle Fields of South Asia, 2004) point out the importance of universities in the recruitment of followers by illegal organizations. It is known that these are masked guerrillas infiltrated recruiting efforts and carry out terrorist acts in cities. Hoods are not so much to ensure the free expression and protect the lives of those who use them to submit ideas and the lives of these three evils otros.Con enough to finish a country is a virus lethal to any society
3301940916609711 
